Group discussion on the role of social media

The group discussion in communication science

Handbook of Non-Standardized Methods in Communication Science pp 1-14 | Cite as

  • Corinna Lüthje
Living reference work entry
First Online:
Part of the Springer NachschlageKissen book series

Summary

Group discussion is the umbrella term for methods of questioning several people at the same time. Group discussion methods differ firstly according to the degree of standardization or openness and secondly according to the object of investigation, which is either the individual in the group or the group itself open group discussion presented in the documentary method. Finally, possible applications in memory research are discussed.

keywords

Group discussion Focus Group documentary method historical reception research Memory archeology
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

literature

  1. Bohnsack, Ralf. 2013. Group discussions. In Qualitative research. A manual, Eds. Uwe Flick, Ernst von Kardorff, and Ines Steinke, 369–384. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  2. Bohnsack, Ralf. 2003. Reconstructive social research. Introduction to qualitative methods. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bohnsack, Ralf, Iris Nentwig-Gesemann, and Arnd-Michael Nohl. 2013. Introduction. In The documentary method and its research practice, Eds. Ralf Bohnsack, Iris Nentwig-Gesemann, and Arnd-Michael Nohl, 9–32. Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohnsack, Ralf, Przyborski Aglaja, and Schäffer Burkhard. 2010. Introduction: Group discussion as a method of reconstructive social research. In The group discussion process in research practice, Eds. Ralf Bohnsack, Aglaja Przyborski, and Burkhard Schäffer, 7–22. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  5. Brendler, Anne-Helen, Sven Jöckel, Filia Niemann, Sophie Peter, Helen Schneider, Hannah Stiebeling, and Tanja Weber. 2013. The role of the individual and mass media in the integration process of young people with a migration background. Journalism 58: 161-178. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brichta, Masha. 2011. "Love it or loathe it": Audience responses to tabloids in the UK and Germany. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  7. Feldhaus, Michael. 2003. The Consequences of Mobile Communication for Privacy. Media & Communication Studies 51: 24-37. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kühn, Thomas, and Kay-Oliver Koschel. 2011. Group discussions. A practical manual. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lamnek, Siegfried. 2010. Qualitative social research. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  10. Lamnek, Siegfried. 1998. Group discussion. theory and practice. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  11. Loos, Peter, and Burkhard Schäffer. 2001. The group discussion process. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lüthje, Corinna. 2008. The medium as symbolic power. Investigation of the socio-cultural impact of media using the example of classic radio. Norderstedt: BoD.Google Scholar
  13. Lüthje, Corinna, and Monika Pater. 2008. The group discussion procedure in the documentary method. Opportunities for historical reception research using the example of the domestication of the radio in the 1950s. Broadcast and history 33 (3-4): 5-15.Google Scholar
  14. Markowitsch, Hans J., and Harald Welzer. 2005. The autobiographical memory. Organic brain basics and biosocial development. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
  15. Merton, Robert K., Marjorie Fiske, and Patricia L. Kendall. 1990. The Focused Interview. A Manual of Problems and Procedures, 2nd ed. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  16. Merton, Robert K. 1987. The Focussed Interview and Focus Group. Continuities and Discontinuities. Public Opinion Quarterley 51: 550-566. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meyen, Michael. 2013. “We lived more freely”: The GDR in the collective memory of the Germans. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  18. Röser, Jutta. 2000. Television violence in a social context. A cultural studies analysis on media appropriation in dominance relationships. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rössler, Patrick, and Anina Vogel. 2005. What interests stars and starlets? Development and application of a scale to measure the reward performance of people magazines: a qualitative-quantitative pilot study. Journalism 50: 438-461. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rowland, Allison L., and Peter Simonson. 2013. The Founding Mothers of Communication Research: Toward a History of a Gendered Assemblage. Critical Studies in Media Communication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2013.849355
  21. Schramm, Holger, Sven Petersen, Karoline Rütter, and Peter Vorderer. 2002. How does the music get on the radio? Status and significance of music research at German radio stations. Media & Communication Studies 50: 227-246. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Welzer, Harald. 2001. The social memory. In The social memory. History, memory, transmission, Ed. Harald Welzer, 9–21. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.Google Scholar

further reading

  1. Merton, Robert K., Marjorie Fiske, and Patricia Kendall. 1990. The Group Interview. In The Focused Interview. A Manual of Problems and Procedures, Eds. Robert K. Merton, Marjorie Fiske and Patricia Kendall, 135-169. New York: The New Press. The new edition of the basic work by Merton, Fiske, and Kendall (original 1956) offers an easy-to-read, easy-to-use and still up-to-date guide for group interviews. A must have for anyone involved in developing group survey methodology.Google Scholar
  2. Bohnsack, Ralf. 2003. Group discussion process and conversation analysis. In Reconstructive social research, Ed. Ralf Bohnsack, 105–128. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. For Ralf Bohnsack, the group discussion in the documentary method belongs to the field of reconstructive social research. On the one hand, the book offers a thorough epistemological and epistemological derivation of the method. On the other hand, it also offers specific tips on application and examples.Google Scholar
  3. Kühn, Thomas and Kay-Volker Koschel. 2011. Group discussions. A practical manual. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag. The book is recommended because of the meticulous processing of the epistemological and methodological foundations of the various group discussion procedures as well as many useful practical tips.Google Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Communication StudiesTU DresdenDresdenGermany